FOR AGRICULTURAL CPA FIRMS

The soil science.
The supporting file.
Your judgment.

Help agricultural clients evaluate residual fertility with a coordinated agronomy and valuation team—and clear documentation your firm can review with confidence.

RESIDUAL FERTILITY / REVIEW FILE

From field evidence
to professional review.

01Agronomic support↗
02Historical valuation↗
03Methodology & assumptions↗
PREPARED FOR YOUR INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS
PROPERTY-SPECIFIC EVIDENCETRACEABLE ASSUMPTIONSDEFINED PROFESSIONAL ROLES

OPEN THE FILE

See what supports the number.

Select a component to see how the evidence fits together.

ASH & ACREFertility Asset RecoveryREPORT CONTENTS · ILLUSTRATION
01 / THE REVIEW FILE

An inventory with an evidence trail.

A useful nutrient inventory explains how the soil results were interpreted and which quantities can be supported. Each step should connect back to the property and its records.

  • Start with the source. Identify the sample date, field, laboratory, extraction method, and units.
  • Apply field context. Evaluate crop needs and supported nutrient thresholds rather than treating every soil result alike.
  • Address the acquisition. Review what the records can establish about fertility present when ownership changed.
Why this matters to your firm

You can follow the path from a laboratory result to the quantity being valued—and see where assumptions or missing records affect the conclusion.

WHAT THE INVENTORY CONNECTS
Illustrative report structure
Review itemSupporting detail
Sample identityField reference, location, and collection date
Lab resultReported nutrient, test method, and measurement units
Critical levelBasis for the crop- and field-specific threshold
Residual quantityCalculation, conversions, and material assumptions
Historical connectionRecords and limitations relevant to acquisition
P PhosphorusK PotassiumS SulfurZn Zinc

Examples of nutrients that may be evaluated. Their presence alone does not establish a qualifying tax asset.

1 of 4 · Nutrient inventory

Conceptual preview of report components. No client data or valuation results are shown. Final contents depend on the property and engagement.

A WORKFLOW THAT RESPECTS YOUR FIRM

Specialist support.
A clear handoff.

Ash & Acre

Coordinates intake, property records, communication, and the specialist review workflow.

Agronomy & valuation team

Evaluates field evidence, develops the supported valuation, and explains the technical methodology.

Your CPA firm

Determines tax eligibility, ownership and basis, treatment, timing, elections, and the return position.

Technical support when questions arise.

Agronomy and valuation specialists support their methodology and conclusions within the agreed audit-support scope. Your firm or the client’s authorized representative handles tax representation.

WHY BRING US INTO THE CONVERSATION?

Make the opportunity
reviewable.

Give agricultural clients access to specialized field analysis while keeping the tax decision with the professionals who know their business.

Start with a discussion of your client portfolio, documentation standards, and the records needed to evaluate a case.

Discuss a working relationship →
01

Acquisition context

Who acquired which parcels, when, and under what ownership structure?

02

Historical support

What connects the evidence to fertility at acquisition and prior management?

03

Traceable valuation

Can quantities, nutrient equivalents, assumptions, and period pricing be followed?

04

Professional conclusion

Does the evidence support your firm’s analysis of an allowable tax position?

BUILD A WORKING RELATIONSHIP

Bring the questions
your clients are asking.

We’ll discuss methodology, deliverables, case selection, and technical support with your team.

Start a CPA Firm Conversation ↗

For your independent review

IRS Publication 225 · Farmer’s Tax Guide ↗USDA-hosted residual fertility tax webinar ↗

General background for professional analysis. These resources do not endorse Ash & Acre or establish a particular client’s eligibility.

A nutrient valuation is not a tax opinion or a guaranteed deduction. Acquisitions back to 2010 may be reviewed when records support the analysis; this does not establish an open filing or amendment period. Engagement terms define deliverables and audit support.